Author Topic: Surrey (H)  (Read 7556 times)

Online dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2072
Surrey (H)
« on: June 24, 2022, 05:38:50 PM »
Surrey won the toss and put Essex in to bat.

Nijjar in for Allison.

Team:
Rossington, Khushi, Pepper, Lawrence, Walter, Westley, Sams, Harmer, Beard, Nijjar, Cook

Roy and Topley back for Surrey.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2022, 05:40:43 PM by dazedpenguin »

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2022, 05:43:21 PM »

Offline Niel01

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2022, 05:45:24 PM »
That is now six consecutive tosses we have lost. Is that a record ?

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2511
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2022, 05:55:32 PM »
Nasser lost 14 in a row in Tests.

Offline ytsejam1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2022, 06:43:05 PM »
...

Nijjar in for Allison.

...

Good.

“Good”!??…….Whilst I don’t think either should be playing, Allison actually bowled much better last night. I DREAD to think what will happen if Nijjar bowls the first over to Roy!! (Hope I’m wrong and I’ve just put the commentators curse on Roy!!)…..Time will tell.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2022, 06:44:50 PM »
Roy can't play spin and never has been able to. Nijjar will get him.

Online dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2072
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2022, 07:42:19 PM »
Beard got there first. Now they need to get Jacks.

And Smith.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2022, 08:34:35 PM »
It's in the bag.

Online dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2072
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2022, 09:00:01 PM »
What a fantastic win. Impressive bowling from Beard and Harmer, top batting from Pepper and Walter and some excellent fielding- particularly catches from Harmer, Westley and Allison.

And against a strong Surrey team.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2022, 09:01:35 PM »
Just imagine how good we'd be if we had a decent o/seas player.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2022, 09:02:23 PM »
What a fantastic win. Impressive bowling from Beard and Harmer, top batting from Pepper and Walter and some excellent fielding- particularly catches from Harmer, Westley and Allison.

And against a strong Surrey team.

In fairness Slurry were missing a load of players.

Offline bwildered

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2575
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2022, 09:06:07 PM »
What a fantastic win. Impressive bowling from Beard and Harmer, top batting from Pepper and Walter and some excellent fielding- particularly catches from Harmer, Westley and Allison.

And against a strong Surrey team.

In fairness Slurry were missing a load of players.

 Great victory for the can’t bat bowl or field Eagles, and now those who did not play !

Online dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2072
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #12 on: June 24, 2022, 09:16:54 PM »

In fairness Slurry were missing a load of players.

They have enough money to collect all the players, so they can cope with missing the Currans, Pope, Foakes and Jamie Overton. With Roy, Jacks, Jordan, Narine and Evans it was still a strong team.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7296
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #13 on: June 24, 2022, 09:21:48 PM »

In fairness Slurry were missing a load of players.

They have enough money to collect all the players, so they can cope with missing the Currans, Pope, Foakes and Jamie Overton. With Roy, Jacks, Jordan, Narine and Evans it was still a strong team.

You forgot Pollard and Clark.

Online Reddevil

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 380
Re: Surrey (H)
« Reply #14 on: June 24, 2022, 09:29:31 PM »
Terrific and very spirited win indeed with telling contributions from so many players. A real team effort.

However can some clever board member please tell me why Westley not only did not bat, but was placed below Harmer and Beard.

Makes no sense to me at all.

I know Westley has struggled this season, and indeed last season but he is still a decent batsman able to put away bad balls and even some good ones.

Can’t help feeling Essex have got their batting order wrong.

It has already been stated a few games back, that Westley should open and with the field up, should
pierce with well placed shots.

He should open with Khushi. Rossington  has been a big disappointment and for whatever reason, has not played a sufficiently long aggressive innings, one of the main reasons  why he was targeted.

Would he not be better suited to bat at 5 or 6, where he could take advantage of medium pacers or spin to exploit his raw power. As an opener he is not working.

Although brief, Pepper’s  innings was explosive. His ramp shots for six, would have made even Joss Butler envious. Clearly a talent.

There is a very thin line between positivity and recklessness as Narine typically and cleverly exploited dismissing both Khushi and Pepper through rash and naive shots within three balls. I hope their dismissals will prove a learning curve.

Can anyone truly believe our position in this campaign, considering our dismal performances last year?.

Not qualified yet, don’t know tonight’s results, but this is a mighty step forward and will fill the lads’ hearts with renewed confidence. They seem to be peaking at the right time.