Author Topic: Lancashire Board facing SGM  (Read 145 times)

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2506
Lancashire Board facing SGM
« on: April 07, 2026, 02:55:00 PM »
I understand that a number of key past players and a number of Vice Presidents have called for members to reject proposals to curtail member rights.

At the moment anyone putting themself forward for election has to be approved before they go on a Ballot paper  and only approved people can stand.

This is the club that told members there was no option to stay at 14 CC matches this season ...

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2506
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2026, 08:39:51 PM »
Lancashire legends launch rebellion against board

"David 'Bumble' Lloyd among those concerned about running of club, amid fears that hierarchy have taken their eye off cricket.

A large group of Lancashire legends have launched a rebellion against the club's board, who they say have left the Red Rose county in a 'mess'.
Former players David Lloyd and Paul Allott are at the heart of the group, which includes many of the club's vice-presidents as well as a series of former chairmen. It is understood that Michael Atherton, Neil Fairbrother and Mike Watkinson are also involved.

The group are concerned about the running of Lancashire under chief executive Daniel Gidney and interim chair Dame Sarah Storey, the Paralympic legend, who they say have taken their eye off cricket.

Storey wrote to members to inform them of a special general meeting next month. Another SGM will be called by the rebels, who fear for Lancashire's future as a members club, asking for greater cricket knowledge on the board.

In a document seen by Telegraph Sport, the rebel group say the changes proposed by a board they describe as 'largely anonymous' would be 'undemocratic' and a 'further attempt to dilute and quell membership challenge, stifle debate and the ability of the membership to hold the Board to account'.

It says: "The impact [of the SGM] is to create unacceptable control of the Club by the Board. If these resolutions succeed, then it's effectively the end of Lancashire CCC as a members' club, since members would be giving up almost all their ability to influence.

?It should be remembered that the Club is first and foremost a cricket club. It is and was constituted as a co-operative society run by the members for the benefit of the members. Its objects are entirely cricket related. Nowhere in the Club's proposed rule changes is there any mention of cricket.
According to the rebels: a disconnect is apparent within the club and morale is the worst in living memory. Put simply the club is in a mess and this Board is not strong enough to get it out.

On the field, it has been a difficult few years for Lancashire. After relegation in 2024, they remain in Division Two of the County Championship. The new season starts next week, with the club being captained by James Anderson, with Steven Croft as head coach."
« Last Edit: April 07, 2026, 08:43:02 PM by essexfan548 »

Offline vim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1554
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2026, 11:08:50 AM »
Taking away the names of the people who have expressed concern. What is left is pretty anonymous. Essex put forward a few unknown and strange choices of recommended candidates.

There is also, a member who stands independently. To do a Lt Cdr William Boakes impression.

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2506
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2026, 11:52:58 AM »
vim, the point is that, anyone can be on an Essex CCC ballot paper, not just the recommended people. That does not happena at Lancs - you have to be approved to get on the ballot paper at all.

Offline vim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1554
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2026, 03:01:06 PM »
A Yorkshire member standing for their committee, advised that you need nomination by 20 members for the application to be valid. At Essex, you just require a proposer and seconder.

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7838
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2026, 03:05:44 PM »
A bit awkward for me as one of the LCCC leadership is closely involved with our place but my heart is with those pushing back against the changes.  I still wonder why the club has built an out ground when the cognoscenti have told us that outgrounds are a thing of the past.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7272
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2026, 03:38:24 PM »
A bit awkward for me as one of the LCCC leadership is closely involved with our place but my heart is with those pushing back against the changes.  I still wonder why the club has built an out ground when the cognoscenti have told us that outgrounds are a thing of the past.

Because the 'outground' will become the main ground for Lanky CCC. Old Trafford will be use for Test matches, T20, *undred crap and concerts. That is, if the current Board have their way.

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7838
Re: Lancashire Board facing SGM
« Reply #7 on: Today at 11:02:46 AM »
A bit awkward for me as one of the LCCC leadership is closely involved with our place but my heart is with those pushing back against the changes.  I still wonder why the club has built an out ground when the cognoscenti have told us that outgrounds are a thing of the past.

Because the 'outground' will become the main ground for Lanky CCC. Old Trafford will be use for Test matches, T20, *undred crap and concerts. That is, if the current Board have their way.

Indeed although the only time in 50 years that they won the CC they used Aigburth instead. Bumble mentioned that the weather in Manchester was not good for getting results.