Author Topic: Glamorgan (H)  (Read 11455 times)

Offline spirali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2024, 08:25:25 PM »
Quote
106/7 from 90/1 while needing 6 an over

What is it with this absolute refusal to play to the match situation? I just don't get it.

Offline dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2066
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2024, 08:45:28 PM »
Quote
106/7 from 90/1 while needing 6 an over

What is it with this absolute refusal to play to the match situation? I just don't get it.

Fortunately Benkenstein and Snater held their nerve, unlike some of those above them in the order. Well played Luc! I think he's going to be a good player.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2024, 08:46:46 PM »
never in doubt.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #18 on: June 07, 2024, 08:47:40 PM »
Quote
106/7 from 90/1 while needing 6 an over

What is it with this absolute refusal to play to the match situation? I just don't get it.

Fortunately Benkenstein and Snater held their nerve, unlike some of those above them in the order. Well played Luc! I think he's going to be a good player.

He's not going to be a good player. He's going to be a great player.

Offline spirali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #19 on: June 07, 2024, 08:48:58 PM »
Very, VERY well done to young Benkenstein, getting us over the line from a seemingly hopeless position. And I thought it was telling that when he played a watchful forward defensive to his first ball, that got a round of applause from the home crowd, clearly relieved that someone, at least, had clocked that it wasn't necessary to hit the leather off every ball.

Offline essexspur

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2024, 08:51:01 PM »
Benkenstein is a proper player with a great attitude; Slater is our new Tendo. Walter can't play spin. Harmer can't keep bowling his full allocation especially when Snater only bowled 1 over. Great win in the end

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #21 on: June 07, 2024, 08:55:54 PM »
Walter should spend the next several days in the nets playing against spin bowling. As it happens I do have some free time in the next few days.

Offline Slogger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1852
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #22 on: June 07, 2024, 09:01:14 PM »
You have to say someone has got it right in picking Benkenstein as the teenager to play in this competitio .

Offline bwildered

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2574
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2024, 07:37:17 AM »
The good, bad and ugly. But Bazball won the day. That?s all that matters.
 

Offline SirChef26

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #24 on: June 08, 2024, 10:55:23 AM »
Two wickets to win, spinners causing chaos and no slip in. We have seen some terrible opposition captaincy this season, in all formats.

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7853
Re: Glamorgan (H)
« Reply #25 on: June 08, 2024, 11:15:38 AM »
Two wickets to win, spinners causing chaos and no slip in. We have seen some terrible opposition captaincy this season, in all formats.

Match fixing?