I have chosen the ones who I believe will be the most contentious and incompetent as my gift to the Club, which may be a parting one.
Thanks for that, I'm sure we will all be delighted with your parting gift to make us worse off, the club you call yourself a supporter of!
The club has its faults, however i really do not see what more off the pitch away from the playing side people expect. We have no money so cannot improve the ground (we may be able to if we want to stop investing in the playing staff), on the pitch we are punching well above our weight, and apart from some contentious team selections, batting coach and groundsman, there's not really anything to complain about.
We have a PC 'scandal' hanging over us that we have to be seen to be complying with as anything else would lead to draconian measures against us, such is the febrile atmosphere amongst noisy minorities (i don't mean ethnic) who see ill in everything, and we are already likely facing some out of proportion punishment for completely unproven allegations, which will likely have a severe financial impact on us (ignoring the expensive box tick QC we have appointed), so not really sure what more people want, or is it the usual meteor way complaints and other such fripperies that the committee won't make a jot of difference to??Do you really think the whole preferred candidate thing is anything other than being pushed and steered by the ECB with an eye on the 'allegations fallout?? do you think the club really have a choice in that??
The only way the ground could be improved is selling it for housing and moving out of town which is highly contentious, and you would all soon be moaning if ground improvements were done at the cost of playing staff. Space prohibits self-funding improvements like Somerset and Kent have done.
Genuinely interested in what realistic, meaningful, costed things we could be doing better off the pitch.