Author Topic: Middlesex (H)  (Read 12778 times)

Offline dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2066
Middlesex (H)
« on: June 01, 2024, 11:30:41 AM »
Unchanged squad for Sunday's game. Probably an unchanged team? Essex really need to win this one.

Harmer, Allison B, Allison C, Beard, Benkenstein, Cox, Critchley, Das, Elgar, Pepper, Richards, Rossington, Sams, Thain, Walter

Offline CostaDelEssex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2024, 09:04:28 AM »
As it's a home game, I'd like to think the naming of a 'squad' is irrelevant.

If Cook and Snater are fit to play, welcome back lads.

Khushi must have announced that he is offski. Very similar to when Ravi was suddenly 'left out' of the T20 side having agreed the deal with Sussex.

Wouldn't surprise me if they left out Pepper and brought in Browne at No.3

Offline dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2066
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2024, 09:14:10 AM »
Wouldn't surprise me if they left out Pepper and brought in Browne at No.3

 ;D

It would be good if they actually say what's happening with Khushi. He did play in the seconds recently so he's probably not injured.

Offline CostaDelEssex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2024, 12:17:59 PM »
he's definitely NOT injured.

I think he's pissed after being left out following his 100 at Durham. He failed a late fitness test due to a 'back injury'.....although he was fit enough to carry out drinks/change of gloves etc as 12th man.

Offline kingstonj1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1552
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2024, 01:03:54 PM »
he's definitely NOT injured.

I think he's pissed after being left out following his 100 at Durham. He failed a late fitness test due to a 'back injury'.....although he was fit enough to carry out drinks/change of gloves etc as 12th man.

And who can blame him, going back to the face fits one of the lads average 20 painfully slow scoring putting everyone else under pressure, slow motion reactions at short leg previous incumbent,

He should be a decent player somewhere as Patel seems to be showing. We have no young openers coming through. So the club must have something up there sleeve surely....all very strange

Offline Crisp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2024, 02:06:12 PM »
he's definitely NOT injured.

I think he's pissed after being left out following his 100 at Durham. He failed a late fitness test due to a 'back injury'.....although he was fit enough to carry out drinks/change of gloves etc as 12th man.

And who can blame him, going back to the face fits one of the lads average 20 painfully slow scoring putting everyone else under pressure, slow motion reactions at short leg previous incumbent,

He should be a decent player somewhere as Patel seems to be showing. We have no young openers coming through. So the club must have something up there sleeve surely....all very strange

Offline Crisp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2024, 02:07:55 PM »
he's definitely NOT injured.

I think he's pissed after being left out following his 100 at Durham. He failed a late fitness test due to a 'back injury'.....although he was fit enough to carry out drinks/change of gloves etc as 12th man.

And who can blame him, going back to the face fits one of the lads average 20 painfully slow scoring putting everyone else under pressure, slow motion reactions at short leg previous incumbent,

He should be a decent player somewhere as Patel seems to be showing. We have no young openers coming through. So the club must have something up there sleeve surely....all very strange
Sometimes its about attitude and not always ability, it will all come out soon, but lets leave it to the management who have had us punching above our weight for the past 6 seasons.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2024, 02:22:49 PM »
he's definitely NOT injured.

I think he's pissed after being left out following his 100 at Durham. He failed a late fitness test due to a 'back injury'.....although he was fit enough to carry out drinks/change of gloves etc as 12th man.

And who can blame him, going back to the face fits one of the lads average 20 painfully slow scoring putting everyone else under pressure, slow motion reactions at short leg previous incumbent,

He should be a decent player somewhere as Patel seems to be showing. We have no young openers coming through. So the club must have something up there sleeve surely....all very strange
Sometimes its about attitude and not always ability, it will all come out soon, but lets leave it to the management who have had us punching above our weight for the past 6 seasons.
Indeed so.

Offline dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2066
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2024, 02:41:05 PM »
Essex won the toss and put Middlesex in. Unchanged team:

Rossington, Elgar, Pepper, Cox, Walter, Critchley, Sams, Harmer, Benkenstein, Allison, Beard

Anyone there today?

Offline vim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1589
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2024, 04:05:18 PM »
Dick Davies is excelling himself today. Not identifying an Essex fielder. Never mind, he has just taken a catch and not identifying the Middlesex batter. There is only a 50/50 chance of getting it right.

Offline CostaDelEssex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2024, 04:10:38 PM »
Yep, he is as shocking as this bowling performance

Offline vim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1589
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2024, 04:10:56 PM »
Another Dick (Head) comment. Keith Fletcher was born in Cambridgeshire, not Cambridge, where the University that you were talking about is.

A well done to the BBC Essex team for not knowing when Middlesex played at Chelmsford in the Championship. It is only in that years, Wisden with the reason why. Do your research.

Offline spirali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2024, 04:24:34 PM »
Commentators also described the Higgins wicket as clean bowled - it wasn't. Actually a sharp stumping by Rossington, and a shame this wasn't recognised.

So 204 the target. Thought it was going to be worse at one stage but still a tough ask. Not sure we got the bowling right - Critchley, the most economical bowler, wasn't given a 4th over, while Beard should not have been given a 3rd after his first two had been hammered. Sams and Walter both bowled quite well I thought.

Offline spirali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2024, 05:05:15 PM »
I suppose it's inevitable that Pepper will always be inconsistent - it's the nature of this type of batting - but he really is great to watch when he's going well.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Middlesex (H)
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2024, 05:25:09 PM »
Walter just can?t play spin, no matter what format of the game.