Author Topic: vs Glamorgan  (Read 19792 times)

Offline squarelegumpire

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
vs Glamorgan
« on: May 23, 2014, 06:28:04 PM »
It doesn't look good at the moment @19.30, 8 overs gone.

Offline stickyboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2014, 06:32:27 PM »
yes currently looking at a 200+ score i reckon

Essexbornandraised

  • Guest
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2014, 06:32:38 PM »
"Essex won the toss and decided to field".

Oh, dear.

IanS

  • Guest
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2014, 06:47:33 PM »
I was wondering how we could conjure a wicket, then two come along in an over. Hope we can keep it tight(er) from here.

Offline squarelegumpire

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2014, 07:12:45 PM »
190 to win!  Could be done!!

IanS

  • Guest
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2014, 07:33:42 PM »
190 to win!  Could be done!!

If we do, it'll be down to the top six. Nos 7 onwards must be the least experienced batsmen ever to play for Essex in a T20.

Offline squarelegumpire

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1460
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2014, 08:39:02 PM »
Some of us, me included, should have more faith!

Another T20 win!

Essexbornandraised

  • Guest
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2014, 08:41:27 PM »
With a 6 from Mr Smith! By Greg, they did it!

Offline stickyboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2014, 08:58:54 PM »
great win by Essex in the end. Well done boys!

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7896
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2014, 09:06:49 PM »
Chalk one up for the Dad's and Lad's Army! Make RtD carry the drinks for the next one.

Offline Stringbok

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 395
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2014, 10:00:32 PM »
I had us down for a loss as soon as I saw the team sheet.....so pleasantly surprised.

Putting them in was the right call as you couldn't count on that threadbare attack defending a total.  As it was the bowlers did well although Sikander bowling to Rudolph was men against boys.  Good performances from Topley, Ryder and Salisbury who at one point was on a hat trick.  I know some on here don't rate Salisbury but from what I saw in this game and the championship match he looks promising.  Not as fast as Mills but five times as accurate.

Pessimism returned once Ryder and Pettini had gone, only for Westley and Foakes to follow up the promise they showed against Sri Lanka.  I never had Westley down as a T20 player but he scored quickly and with proper cricket shots.  The real man of the match though was Foster who brought the required run rate down from 9 to 6 an over with one over of brutal hitting. Still time for some more pessimism when Foster departed.  Was there any batting left? Enter the much maligned Smith to steer the ship home.

I was intrigued to see the size of the crowd. I've always thought that, Friday nights notwithstanding, more games spread over a longer period would not be the money spinner Essex hoped for. Early days but it was definitely not a sell out - I would say about the size of a very well attended 40 over game.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7327
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2014, 10:09:31 PM »
Well done to the team, great win.

Offline quincy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2014, 10:45:12 AM »
I had us down for a loss as soon as I saw the team sheet.....so pleasantly surprised.

Putting them in was the right call as you couldn't count on that threadbare attack defending a total.  As it was the bowlers did well although Sikander bowling to Rudolph was men against boys.  Good performances from Topley, Ryder and Salisbury who at one point was on a hat trick.  I know some on here don't rate Salisbury but from what I saw in this game and the championship match he looks promising.  Not as fast as Mills but five times as accurate.

Pessimism returned once Ryder and Pettini had gone, only for Westley and Foakes to follow up the promise they showed against Sri Lanka.  I never had Westley down as a T20 player but he scored quickly and with proper cricket shots.  The real man of the match though was Foster who brought the required run rate down from 9 to 6 an over with one over of brutal hitting. Still time for some more pessimism when Foster departed.  Was there any batting left? Enter the much maligned Smith to steer the ship home.

I was intrigued to see the size of the crowd. I've always thought that, Friday nights notwithstanding, more games spread over a longer period would not be the money spinner Essex hoped for. Early days but it was definitely not a sell out - I would say about the size of a very well attended 40 over game.

Good summary Springbok, echoed my thoughts on the game.

Someone heard that the crowd was 4,100. which sounds about right.

What did grate was looking at all the empty seats, having been forced to pay the extra £7 for a reserved seat. I think asking people to pay £18/£29 for a seat is pushing it.

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7896
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2014, 10:54:51 AM »
I'm really pleased to see that we've not become reliant on one or two batters, once swampy and pudgy had gone we ought to have folded, but actually accelerated.

I'm interested in Salisbury: seemingly a replacement for Palladino? Not a Mills/Toppers speedster but could be a reliable seamer for the future? His batting seems to show promise too, or am I getting over excited?

Offline Valentines Park

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3827
  • In Ron We Trust
Re: vs Glamorgan
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2014, 11:12:16 AM »
I think asking people to pay £18/£29 for a seat is pushing it.

Saj Mahmood doesn't pay for himself.