Author Topic: Newton report  (Read 59316 times)

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7920
Re: Newton report
« Reply #45 on: February 16, 2024, 09:26:36 PM »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-13092285/Essex-double-standards-racism-cases-report-slurs-dressing-room-banter.html


Well, these accusations amount to ?slurs? if there is no concrete evidence?  Good on Michael Vaughan for standing up for his good name?I never thought I?d say that.

I?m not necessarily surprised that inappropriate  things were said given the shambolic running of the club, but this sounds like unnecessary sh**stirring now.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7397
Re: Newton report
« Reply #46 on: February 16, 2024, 10:27:41 PM »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-13092285/Essex-double-standards-racism-cases-report-slurs-dressing-room-banter.html

So, after the independently recommended sanctions have been implemented against individuals the 'Cricket Regulator' will review and possibly add their own sanctions.

What a nonsense.

Offline nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7397
Re: Newton report
« Reply #47 on: February 16, 2024, 10:31:00 PM »
Is 'salad dodger' a (racial) slur?!

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7920
Re: Newton report
« Reply #48 on: February 17, 2024, 04:03:03 PM »
Is 'salad dodger' a (racial) slur?!

Might be weightist?!?!

Offline bwildered

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2658
Re: Newton report
« Reply #49 on: February 28, 2024, 06:13:46 PM »
Essex County Cricket Club (Essex CCC) can confirm that sanctions have been imposed against the individuals implicated in Katharine Newton KC?s independent review into historic allegations of racism.

Following the publication of Ms Newton?s report on 08 December 2023, the Club commissioned an independent committee who recommended disciplinary measures.

While the individuals are not named to align with the anonymised report, Essex CCC takes allegations of racism extremely seriously and the measures are a further commitment to creating an inclusive and welcoming club for everyone.

Essex CCC have shared the measures with the England and Wales Cricket Board and reaffirms its pledge to promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion within cricket to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7920
Re: Newton report
« Reply #50 on: February 29, 2024, 02:22:32 PM »
They?ve been given ?a bit of a slap?, metaphorically?

Offline bwildered

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2658
Re: Newton report
« Reply #51 on: March 05, 2024, 08:27:55 PM »
Essex County Cricket Club (Essex CCC) can confirm that sanctions have been imposed against the individuals implicated in Katharine Newton KC?s independent review into historic allegations of racism.

 Can understand not naming individuals, but what do the sanctions consist, fines ?

Offline vim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Newton report
« Reply #52 on: March 06, 2024, 06:48:07 AM »
No doubt the sanctions will be the same as it was suggested to me that I might be sanctioned for complaining too much as to how the club was run on and off the field, back in the dark ages. I responded that I would be as worried as much as if I was threatened with excommunication.

This is not a court of law and anyone can tell them to stuff their fines. As to other sanctions such as a ban. They can always seek a judicial review alleging restraint of trade. The Cricket authorities are good ay defending those actions. It really worked with Kerry Packer.

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2527
Re: Newton report
« Reply #53 on: June 03, 2024, 05:36:35 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/cmllvz41k72o

Essex have been charged over allegations relating to racist language or conduct at the club between 2001 and 2010.

The charges have been brought by the Cricket Regulator, accusing Essex of breaching England and Wales Cricket Board directive 3.3.

It states that "no participant may conduct themself in a manner, do any act or make any omission at any time which is improper or which may be prejudicial to the interests of cricket or which may bring the ECB, the game of cricket or any cricketer or group of cricketers into disrepute."

Essex say they have co-operated fully with the regulator and would continue to do so.

The case will now be heard by an independent Cricket Discipline Commission and the club said in a statement that they would "participate willingly".

The statement added: "There will be no further comment from the club at this time."

Offline bwildered

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2658
Re: Newton report
« Reply #54 on: June 04, 2024, 03:29:02 PM »
Chief executive John Stephenson says Essex will never publicly name former players and staff members allegedly involved in racist behaviour.
The club have been charged with breaching England and Wales Cricket Board rules relating to racist language or conduct between 2001 and 2010.
The case will now be heard by an independent Cricket Discipline Commission.
Stephenson told BBC Essex Sport that a decision over whether to admit the charge would be taken at a board meeting later this week.
Essex commissioned their own inquiry into the issues, culminating in a report by Katharine Newton KC, published in December, which concluded that a number of the club's former players were victims of racist abuse and discriminatory treatment.
Jahid Ahmed, Maurice Chambers and Zoheb Sharif were among those whose allegations prompted the inquiry, but the report did not identify any victims or perpetrators by name.
"That?s never going to come out," said Stephenson.
"We have to think about the welfare of the individuals - we've taken a lot of advice on that in terms of data privacy and there will be nothing more said on that."
Stephenson has been chief executive at Chelmsford since the autumn of 2021, having previously worked for the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC).


How will anyone know if any punishments have been instigated, if nobody knows was proved guilty ?

Offline golden duck

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Newton report
« Reply #55 on: June 04, 2024, 06:25:39 PM »
I'm quite woke but I have to say this is a nonsense.
The club has spent a fortune reviewing and exposing the historical wrongdoing. Now as thanks for doing the right thing the club gets charged, surely the club should be congratulated? I understand the shared responsibility of individual and employer but what more could the club do? I don't believe any of the 2001 to 2010 incidents were reported and ignored?
It will now knock another hole in the accounts as we will need professional help to front up to the kangaroo court.
Is there a risk of another charge for the Farragher incident where the club has been found negligent? That was a different time span completely.

Offline squarelegumpire

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1461
Re: Newton report
« Reply #56 on: June 04, 2024, 07:15:49 PM »
Points deduction incoming?
Hope not, but has to be a possibility.

Offline SirChef26

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1694
Re: Newton report
« Reply #57 on: June 04, 2024, 10:49:11 PM »
Points deduction incoming?
Hope not, but has to be a possibility.
If the club decide to admit the charge, the smart move I think would be to lobby the ICDC if possible for a heavier fine rather than any points deduction, citing sporting integrity and not punishing the current playing squad undeservedly.

I have no idea how these cases work from a timescale point of view, but I assume admitting the charge would mean punishment sooner rather than later, whilst contesting it would drag it out longer, possibly past the end of the season, thus dodging any points deduction this year.

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7920
Re: Newton report
« Reply #58 on: June 05, 2024, 11:48:11 AM »
I'm quite woke but I have to say this is a nonsense.
The club has spent a fortune reviewing and exposing the historical wrongdoing. Now as thanks for doing the right thing the club gets charged, surely the club should be congratulated? I understand the shared responsibility of individual and employer but what more could the club do? I don't believe any of the 2001 to 2010 incidents were reported and ignored?
It will now knock another hole in the accounts as we will need professional help to front up to the kangaroo court.
Is there a risk of another charge for the Farragher incident where the club has been found negligent? That was a different time span completely.

Totally agree.  Things were not right in the dressing room or the club at that time. These may not be players who were going to make it, but clearly I wouldn?t want to have been at the club at the time: favouritism and the opposite are very northern?although is ?northern? a protected characteristic? Given the boot was put into Yorkshire even makes me very worried.

Offline kingstonj1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1559
Re: Newton report
« Reply #59 on: July 08, 2024, 09:21:50 PM »
I understand the ex coach was the one many wanted to go long before he did and a convicted cheat of an os leggie was another but who is the current staff members meant to be.

Someone mentions an ex Yorkie bowler but I can't think anyone who fits the bill other than a serving umpire, someone who was briefly on loan  and never played again or someone who was most recently employed to help resurrect Yorkshire own image.

Obviously without naming names.