Author Topic: Hampshire (H)  (Read 10231 times)

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2023, 08:11:09 PM »
And let's face it he was lucky to last even that long. He was in kamikaze mode for most of that innings.

The concern is that his batting hasn't developed since he was 17yo. A worry.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2023, 08:12:16 PM »
Dawson doing us a favour by getting rid of Khushi.

Offline SirChef26

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1675
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2023, 08:13:28 PM »
Hampshire are showing that despite all the theories, analysts and the potential dew etc etc, the best thing you can do in white ball cricket on a flat pitch is bat first, get a biggie and let scoreboard pressure do the rest.

Khushi hasn't helped us by not retiring out, but that's irrelevant now. This is all about trying to soften what will be a big blow to the net-run-rate.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2023, 08:16:19 PM »
Hampshire are showing that despite all the theories, analysts and the potential dew etc etc, the best thing you can do in white ball cricket on a flat pitch is bat first, get a biggie and let scoreboard pressure do the rest.

Khushi hasn't helped us by not retiring out, but that's irrelevant now. This is all about trying to soften what will be a big blow to the net-run-rate.

Yep always bat first. Always.

Offline essexspur

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2023, 08:23:58 PM »
We're at home but completely misjudged the pitch by leaving out a seamer. Very strange. Massive wake up call.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2023, 08:27:23 PM »
We're at home but completely misjudged the pitch by leaving out a seamer. Very strange. Massive wake up call.
I'm afraid this is all on Harmer. Chose to field first, played the extra spinner and bowled himself on the last over.

Offline bwildered

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2575
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #21 on: June 02, 2023, 08:41:02 PM »
 Champs v Chumps . 
This has been a bazball wheels off production big time. A typical example when it ALL goes pants up ( or down ).
 
 PS - Quick glance that Rossington got the TOP score
 

Offline dazedpenguin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #22 on: June 02, 2023, 08:42:24 PM »
More or less everything went wrong, but that Vince innings was special. I don't think they'll repeat the spin experiment for a while.

Never mind, there'll be another one along on Sunday. Somerset haven't lost yet, so maybe they're due. I hope Khushi's injury isn't too serious.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #23 on: June 02, 2023, 08:44:22 PM »
More or less everything went wrong, but that Vince innings was special. I don't think they'll repeat the spin experiment for a while.

Never mind, there'll be another one along on Sunday. Somerset haven't lost yet, so maybe they're due. I hope Khushi's injury isn't too serious.

This rabble aren't beating Ciderset in Taunton.

Offline Reddevil

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 380
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #24 on: June 02, 2023, 09:03:21 PM »
I think Hampshire should rename themselves as Vinceshire.

He has virtually single handed this season, carried Hampshire, batting wise.

When on song, no better batsman and his cover driving something to behold.

I am fortunate to see Vince very often as I live in Hampshire.

No disgrace to lose to Hampshire, for when they turn up, are a  very good side.

We did not help ourselves by strange tactical errors, mainly toss and that scoreboard pressure is always worth a couple of wickets.

As for Lawrence, same old, same old.

He seems to be going backwards. Is incapable of constructing and pacing an innings. Very worrying.

Cannot see him making the England team, especially considering the progress shown over the winter by his three greatest challengers, Pope, Duckett and Brook.

However silver cloud , no England, many more appearances  for Essex. I only hope he makes them count.


Offline JasonP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3167
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #25 on: June 02, 2023, 09:52:38 PM »
Losing like that can happen in T20 cricket.  As has been said the team selection, toss and some of the bowling options, Nijjar first over and Harmer the last was a bit baffling.

There should have been a bit of common sense used towards the end as well.  We should have batted out the overs with the last 3 or 4 wickets.  In the event of being level on points our run rate is pretty much certain to be worse than anyone we’re level with.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2023, 10:06:08 PM »
Losing like that can happen in T20 cricket.  As has been said the team selection, toss and some of the bowling options, Nijjar first over and Harmer the last was a bit baffling.

There should have been a bit of common sense used towards the end as well.  We should have batted out the overs with the last 3 or 4 wickets.  In the event of being level on points our run rate is pretty much certain to be worse than anyone we’re level with.

No way they were going to just play out the innings. The crowd wouldn't accept it and the players don't have the mindset. Batting first would have almost certainly made a closer game, win or lose.

Offline Niel01

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #27 on: June 03, 2023, 09:20:50 AM »
Couldn’t even make any sort of competition of the game. From first over from 4th choice spinner on an unresponsive pitch they never looked back. Little excitement for Fans. First T20 match for my 12 year old Grandson - don’t think he will be very keen to go again after that.

Offline golden duck

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #28 on: June 03, 2023, 10:30:32 AM »
A miserable night, cold weather killed the atmosphere and the a total non-event on the field.

Rossington looked ready to have his one big knock for the year but that ridiculously bad decision summed the night up...rubbish.

And the club will get a bill for the broken window in Hayes Close.

Offline spirali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Hampshire (H)
« Reply #29 on: June 03, 2023, 10:53:33 AM »
Quote
that ridiculously bad decision

I would be cutting the umpire some slack for that. It was a freak occurrence, the ball hitting the off bail but not dislodging it. Umpire obviously heard the noise, so an understandable error rather than a howler, I'd say. Unfortunate for Rossington to be given out caught behind, but then again he was only saved from being bowled by a freak event.