Author Topic: Governance Action Plan  (Read 7993 times)

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Governance Action Plan
« on: June 29, 2022, 09:47:34 AM »
News item just published. Hmmm...
...
If my speed reading is accurate then do I correctly surmise that all candidates for the board will be 'vetted' by a nominations committee and only those approved by said committee will go forward on to the ballot?

Offline Andy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7853
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2022, 09:49:58 AM »
News item just published. Hmmm...
...
If my speed reading is accurate then do I correctly surmise that all candidates for the board will be 'vetted' by a nominations committee and only those approved by said committee will go forward on to the ballot?

That rules us out, then.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2022, 09:58:56 AM »
I'll vote for you if you vote for me.

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2022, 10:10:31 AM »
I have just noticed that Essex CEO John Stephenson is also a director of London Spirit. I don't remember this being announced/publicised. I thought the b*****d *undred franchises were to be completely separate from the counties.

A conflict of interest?

Offline kingstonj1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1552
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2022, 10:46:39 AM »
No the counties had a notional connection with a franchise to keep them engaged Essex and Middlesex? with London Spirit (and the MCC if i'm not mistaken) were the 3 with an 'interest/link' to London Spirit.

Offline Perov

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2022, 10:56:24 AM »
Also the Members Forum to be held on a match day AFTER close of play at 6.30pm.
I much preferred the lunchtime forums held under Mr Farragher,  which were well attended.
I suspect the later time is to reduce the numbers who attend.
Maybe alternate, with one forum at 6.30pm and the next one at 1pm.

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2511
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2022, 11:09:00 AM »
Also the Members Forum to be held on a match day AFTER close of play at 6.30pm.
I much preferred the lunchtime forums held under Mr Farragher,  which were well attended.
I suspect the later time is to reduce the numbers who attend.
Maybe alternate, with one forum at 6.30pm and the next one at 1pm.

It does say over Zoom as well ...

Offline bobw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2022, 11:10:59 AM »
Members to now have a vote on the make up of a members Committee. Correct me if I am wrong, but as a members club I thought the Committee was a Members Commitee.

Offline Suffolk Richard

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2022, 10:51:17 PM »
Not too long in the future membership will be just a posh word for season ticket holders I reckon.

Offline Slogger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1852
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2022, 05:48:02 AM »
No the counties had a notional connection with a franchise to keep them engaged Essex and Middlesex? with London Spirit (and the MCC if i'm not mistaken) were the 3 with an 'interest/link' to London Spirit.

I may be wrong but I think the CEO's London Spirit directorship may have originated with his role at the MCC. Bizarrely the other county associated with the Lord's franchise are Northants. Northampton is a very similar distance from Lord's, Trent Bridge and Edgbaston so presumably it was convenient to align them to Lord's for some reason.
 

Offline Slogger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1852
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2022, 06:01:53 AM »
Not too long in the future membership will be just a posh word for season ticket holders I reckon.

That's my fear. Mr Faragher was totally opposed to this trend but I can see that the ECB may find a move towards clubs being run by boards of directors/owners with injections of private capital easier to deal with than a group of mutually owned clubs. Of course de mutualisation in the building society was a stunning success but that won't stop the speculators and asset strippers if they get the chance.

Offline vim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1589
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2022, 06:48:53 AM »
Speaking to John Farragher over coffee upstairs during the last game. If you want to name drop, pay the extra £275 and you can as well, unless a invite myself individual has not button holed him first. John Farragher stated that nominating people is a sign of failure in finding enough suitable candidates to stand. I can see why people would be vetted. There are five new vacancies and this would possibly let in the people who finish at the bottom of the ballot.

Think of some of the characters that have stood in the past. Do you want them in any position of responsibility?

Online nat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7292
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2022, 08:02:01 AM »
Speaking to John Farragher over coffee upstairs during the last game. If you want to name drop, pay the extra £275 and you can as well, unless a invite myself individual has not button holed him first. John Farragher stated that nominating people is a sign of failure in finding enough suitable candidates to stand. I can see why people would be vetted. There are five new vacancies and this would possibly let in the people who finish at the bottom of the ballot.

Think of some of the characters that have stood in the past. Do you want them in any position of responsibility?

You really believe that Board-led vetting of candidates is a good idea? An election is the appropriate way to 'vet' candidates.

Offline essexfan548

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2511
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2022, 10:10:20 AM »
Speaking to John Farragher over coffee upstairs during the last game. If you want to name drop, pay the extra £275 and you can as well, unless a invite myself individual has not button holed him first. John Farragher stated that nominating people is a sign of failure in finding enough suitable candidates to stand. I can see why people would be vetted. There are five new vacancies and this would possibly let in the people who finish at the bottom of the ballot.

Think of some of the characters that have stood in the past. Do you want them in any position of responsibility?

You don't have to pay - I claimed my 'free day' for myself and a guest. As a lomg-standing Life Member this was a perk we were offered because of covid.

Offline mawallace

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 973
Re: Governance Action Plan
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2022, 01:15:18 PM »
No the counties had a notional connection with a franchise to keep them engaged Essex and Middlesex? with London Spirit (and the MCC if i'm not mistaken) were the 3 with an 'interest/link' to London Spirit.


Yes - the counties are linked as follows:-

Manchester Originals - Lancashire (the only one to decide to go it alone!)
Northern Superchargers - Yorkshire and Durham
Birmingham Phoenix - Warwickshire and Worcestershire
Trent Rockets - Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Leicestershire
Welsh Fire - Glamorgan, Gloucestershire and Somerset
London Spirit - Middlesex, Essex and  Northamptonshire
Oval Invincibles - Surry and Kent
Southern Brave - Hampshire and Sussex

Angus Fraser is the director representing Middlesex,  Guy Lavender chairman of MCC, Ray Payne, director of Northamptonshire , John Stephenson, Essex

John was not appointed until 10 December 2021

That's how all the Hundred teams are set up.