Essex Outfielder : The Unofficial Essex CCC Forum

Cricket => Essex Second XI => Topic started by: nat on July 17, 2023, 12:55:49 PM

Title: vs Slurry
Post by: nat on July 17, 2023, 12:55:49 PM
So, Browne fails again. Das too. Pepper is not even playing so presumably he/the club have given up on him playing 4-day cricket. With Khushi injured the batting resources look thin for the 1XI game vs K*nt later this week.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: dazedpenguin on July 17, 2023, 01:24:24 PM
They'll go for the same team probably, with Browne opening, Das in the squad and the choice between Buttleman and Rossington. Lawrence should be available. Although if Rymell gets a big score he could find himself opening. Just needs to take the opportunity.

As to what they do for the one day cup with Khushi injured, that's going to be a real challenge.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: JasonP on July 17, 2023, 01:26:03 PM
So, Browne fails again. Das too. Pepper is not even playing so presumably he/the club have given up on him playing 4-day cricket. With Khushi injured the batting resources look thin for the 1XI game vs K*nt later this week.

There was a interview 3 days ago.  "I don't like tipping myself as just a T20 player," Pepper says. "I'm still trying to get in all the Essex teams. I've still got quite a heavy focus on four-day cricket,
He has had a hand injury so maybe they're not willing to risk him in 4 day cricket at the moment.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: JasonP on July 17, 2023, 02:20:54 PM
Match abandoned due to an unfit pitch.

https://www.essexcricket.org.uk/matchzone/?tab=m_scorecard#mfa82b372-2122-4dd6-bac4-a3c51c79f507
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: nat on July 17, 2023, 02:24:20 PM
Match abandoned due to an unfit pitch.

https://www.essexcricket.org.uk/matchzone/?tab=m_scorecard#mfa82b372-2122-4dd6-bac4-a3c51c79f507
IIRC this is not the first such occurrence at Billericay.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: dazedpenguin on July 17, 2023, 02:41:00 PM
How do they decide it's unfit? Dangerous, inconsistent bounce?
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: essexfan548 on July 17, 2023, 02:45:44 PM
Was Beard injured? He's down as 'retired not out'
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Slogger on July 17, 2023, 02:53:10 PM
Now I know my memory isn't what it was but I can't recall unfit pitch issues at the very successful mini festivals at Coggeshall and Halstead. People turned up in good numbers at those venues too. Maybe time to get back there.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: dazedpenguin on July 17, 2023, 03:02:06 PM
Was Beard injured? He's down as 'retired not out'

Reading a tweet from a Surrey supporter it sounds like Beard was injured. This is verbatim:

"Micky mouse at Billericay CC as the 2nd X1 4 day game between Essex & Surrey is abandoned after 20 overs, pitch unfit. Umpires, who were not 1st class, had to ring the ECB for advice after an Essex batter went off injured"

Another tweet mentioned it was classed as a dangerous pitch. Just as well it didn't continue for longer in that case.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: dazedpenguin on July 17, 2023, 03:46:10 PM
Essex have just tweeted to confirm:

"The pitch for Essex's Second XI Championship fixture against Surrey at Billericay has been deemed unfit.

After 21 overs of play, both sides agreed to abandon the match for the safety of the players."
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Perov on July 17, 2023, 03:51:17 PM
How do they decide it's unfit? Dangerous, inconsistent bounce?

I was there. 4 or 5 balls "popped" and rose up very  sharply, Beard was hit on the hand and retired, McKeena fended one off  his face and was caught and bowled. There was a sharp downpour  which further livened up the pitch, and with the rain break it allowed Dunn and McKerr, to continue bowling for 19 overs  continuously. They were a handful, and the Umpires decided to ring the ECB for advice. One of the Umpires was Harris who is listed in Playfair so not a novice, although no first class games to date.   Probably the right decision, but none of the batters could be blamed for being dismissed on such a tricky surface.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: dazedpenguin on July 17, 2023, 03:57:11 PM
Thanks Perov. That sounds shocking. Shades of Sabina Park in the 1998 test.I hope Beard is ok, he'll be needed in the 50 over cup.

Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Crisp on July 17, 2023, 07:08:15 PM
How do they decide it's unfit? Dangerous, inconsistent bounce?

I was there. 4 or 5 balls "popped" and rose up very  sharply, Beard was hit on the hand and retired, McKeena fended one off  his face and was caught and bowled. There was a sharp downpour  which further livened up the pitch, and with the rain break it allowed Dunn and McKerr, to continue bowling for 19 overs  continuously. They were a handful, and the Umpires decided to ring the ECB for advice. One of the Umpires was Harris who is listed in Playfair so not a novice, although no first class games to date.   Probably the right decision, but none of the batters could be blamed for being dismissed on such a tricky surface.
I went before the storm this morning and a couple of balls flew through, but I agree the 2 early wickets were not lost through the pitch misbehaving.
I went to the Middlesex game just 2 weeks ago and the pitch was placid.
A potential fine and Surreys expenses will be coming our way.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Andy on July 19, 2023, 11:35:01 AM
How do they decide it's unfit? Dangerous, inconsistent bounce?

I was there. 4 or 5 balls "popped" and rose up very  sharply, Beard was hit on the hand and retired, McKeena fended one off  his face and was caught and bowled. There was a sharp downpour  which further livened up the pitch, and with the rain break it allowed Dunn and McKerr, to continue bowling for 19 overs  continuously. They were a handful, and the Umpires decided to ring the ECB for advice. One of the Umpires was Harris who is listed in Playfair so not a novice, although no first class games to date.   Probably the right decision, but none of the batters could be blamed for being dismissed on such a tricky surface.
I went before the storm this morning and a couple of balls flew through, but I agree the 2 early wickets were not lost through the pitch misbehaving.
I went to the Middlesex game just 2 weeks ago and the pitch was placid.
A potential fine and Surreys expenses will be coming our way.

That’s the reason we don’t have outgrounds anymore.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Valentines Park on July 19, 2023, 07:20:47 PM

That’s the reason we don’t have outgrounds anymore.

Funny how every other county manages to make outgrounds work.
 
Danny Macklin has been gone a long while now I don't know why his legacy can't finally be binned.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: stewyww on July 19, 2023, 08:23:39 PM
How do they decide it's unfit? Dangerous, inconsistent bounce?

I was there. 4 or 5 balls "popped" and rose up very  sharply, Beard was hit on the hand and retired, McKeena fended one off  his face and was caught and bowled. There was a sharp downpour  which further livened up the pitch, and with the rain break it allowed Dunn and McKerr, to continue bowling for 19 overs  continuously. They were a handful, and the Umpires decided to ring the ECB for advice. One of the Umpires was Harris who is listed in Playfair so not a novice, although no first class games to date.   Probably the right decision, but none of the batters could be blamed for being dismissed on such a tricky surface.
I went before the storm this morning and a couple of balls flew through, but I agree the 2 early wickets were not lost through the pitch misbehaving.
I went to the Middlesex game just 2 weeks ago and the pitch was placid.
A potential fine and Surreys expenses will be coming our way.

That’s the reason we don’t have outgrounds anymore.
Sorry that is a ridiculous generalisation and conclusion.
I think the lack of a groundsman might be a better clue.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Andy on July 20, 2023, 08:20:04 AM
How do they decide it's unfit? Dangerous, inconsistent bounce?

I was there. 4 or 5 balls "popped" and rose up very  sharply, Beard was hit on the hand and retired, McKeena fended one off  his face and was caught and bowled. There was a sharp downpour  which further livened up the pitch, and with the rain break it allowed Dunn and McKerr, to continue bowling for 19 overs  continuously. They were a handful, and the Umpires decided to ring the ECB for advice. One of the Umpires was Harris who is listed in Playfair so not a novice, although no first class games to date.   Probably the right decision, but none of the batters could be blamed for being dismissed on such a tricky surface.
I went before the storm this morning and a couple of balls flew through, but I agree the 2 early wickets were not lost through the pitch misbehaving.
I went to the Middlesex game just 2 weeks ago and the pitch was placid.
A potential fine and Surreys expenses will be coming our way.

That’s the reason we don’t have outgrounds anymore.
Sorry that is a ridiculous generalisation and conclusion.
I think the lack of a groundsman might be a better clue.

Ah Stewyy, I’ve missed your passive-aggressive responses.  I think you know full well that we were denied a county championship because of the poor state of the pitch at Southchurch Park.  Whether it was any worse than other grounds is debatable, but we have no more out grounds for the first team and that was an ongoing trend since the 1990s.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: nat on July 20, 2023, 07:17:37 PM
So 'passive aggressive' is not allowed now?! In that case I will have to re-write all my motivational coaching books.
Title: Re: vs Slurry
Post by: Andy on July 21, 2023, 09:35:43 AM
So 'passive aggressive' is not allowed now?! In that case I will have to re-write all my motivational coaching books.

You could call it ‘tough love’.  I fear I may owe Mr Stewy money…
Title: Don Topley Cricket Festival cancelled. ,
Post by: Rosserial_lat on May 18, 2026, 02:26:48 PM
If the ECB were to award a T20 WorldCup knockout match to the modest Essex County grounddespite its limited capacity and facilitieswould the gamble boost the countys profile or simply embarrass English cricket on the world stage?
         :     ,    ??     ??.         ,    ,                   (http://new-kino24.ru/russkie/)